Skip to content

VAT reverse charge mechanism: preventing VAT fraud

The Council is working on a proposal for a Council directive which aims to allow the application of a generalised VAT reverse charge mechanism to domestic transactions between businesses involving services or goods with an invoice exceeding €10 000. The application of the mechanism would be allowed under certain conditions.

The reverse charge mechanism moves the responsibility for the reporting of a VAT transaction from the seller to the buyer of a good or service. 

Application of such a mechanism would constitute a derogation from the main general principles of the EU's current VAT system and therefore requires amending directive 2006/112/EC on the common system of value added tax. According to the proposal, the derogation would be granted for a limited period of time and would be voluntary for member states fulfilling the conditions set out in the proposed directive.

The aim is to help some member states that are particularly affected by VAT fraud and do not have sufficient measures to combat it, which could be the case in instances of VAT fraud schemes such as the 'carousel' or 'missing trader' schemes.

The proposed directive would offer a solution limited in time, according to which supplies would be taxed in the country of destination.

Why was the proposal made?

The proposal was made following a request by the EU member states that are particularly affected by loss of revenue due to VAT fraud, especially carousel fraud.

According to the European Commission, the VAT gap (the difference between the expected VAT revenue and the VAT actually collected by tax authorities) in the EU has reached nearly €160 billion, of which about €50 billion is attributable to cross-border fraud (in 2013).

The possibility to apply the reverse charge mechanism exists in the current system as well; however, its application is not generalised and is limited to a certain list of sectors. Its application is also limited in time. It was introduced by EC directive 2013/43/EU.

What is 'carousel' or 'missing trader' fraud?

In the EU, carousel fraud typically involves cross-border transactions between businesses.

Under the EU's current VAT system, intra-EU business-to-business (B2B) cross-border supplies are exempted from VAT, whereas the obligation to pay the VAT to the government budget lies with the vendor of the goods and services on the destination market (the vendor is the VAT collector).

In essence, the cross-border movement of goods in the EU is split into two transactions:

  • the intra-EU supply of goods is exempted from VAT
  • the intra-EU acquisition of goods is subject to VAT in the country of destination, where the VAT collector is the vendor

How does a missing trader or carousel fraud scheme work?

The scheme involves several companies selling goods or services, imported VAT-free from a supplier (the so-called conduit company) in another EU country, to each other on a domestic market.

One of the companies in the chain, usually the one that imported the goods, does not pay the VAT to the state budget despite charging it to the next buyer, thus committing fraud. This company usually very quickly disappears without trace following the transaction (hence the 'missing trader'). This makes the tax collection impossible in the state in which goods or services are consumed. The other buyers in the chain, meanwhile, redeem the VAT from the state budget after selling the goods further. The goods or services may in reality not even move, or may only exist on paper.

The 'carousel' starts turning again when the final buyer in the chain on the domestic market re-sells the goods to the first supplier, i.e. the company that brought the goods into the country, allowing the whole process to start again. This last transaction, being a cross-border one, would again be exempt from VAT.

The scheme can also function on the domestic market only.

The reverse charge mechanism is a measure that shifts liability for final VAT payment to the government budget from the vendor to the customer. In this way it aims to reduce the risk of VAT fraud.

Key elements of the proposal

Legislative procedure

The adoption of the draft directive requires a special legislative procedure: a unanimous vote by the Council, after consulting the European Parliament.  The Council is not legally obliged to take the Parliament's opinion into account, but according to the case-law of the Court of Justice, it must not take a decision without having received it.

Conditions for applying the mechanism

According to the proposal, the conditions that a member state must meet to be able to apply the generalised reverse charge mechanism should be the following:

  • the member state's VAT gap should be five percentage points above the median European VAT gap
  • the level of carousel fraud in the member state should make up more than 25% of its VAT gap
  • the member state should prove that conventional measures are not sufficient to fight this kind of fraud

The proposal further stipulates that the European Commission would have three months to authorise or reject a member state's request to apply the mechanism, depending on whether the requirements are fulfilled.

Neighbouring member states

According to the proposal, a member state that has a common border with the state applying the generalised reverse charge mechanism should also be authorised to apply this mechanism, under certain conditions.

Repealing the mechanism

The draft directive proposes that if a considerable negative impact on trade within the EU's internal market occurs after the introduction of the mechanism, it would have to be repealed, without retroactive effect, after a six-month period.

Time limit

The proposal suggests that the mechanism should be in force until 30 September 2022. It will then be assessed by the Commission.

    • 1 January

      In the Council

  • 2018

    • 2 October

      Council agrees on reverse charge mechanism

      On 2 October, the Council agreed a the proposal that will allow temporary derogations from normal VAT rules in order to better prevent VAT fraud. The directive will allow member states that are most severely affected by VAT fraud to temporarily apply a generalised reversal of VAT liability.

      Member states will be able to use the generalised reverse charge mechanism (GRCM): 

      • only for domestic supplies of goods and services above a threshold of €17 500 per transaction
      • only up until 30 June 2022 
      • and under very strict technical conditions

      In particular, in a member state that wishes to apply such measure, 25% of the VAT gap has to be due to carousel fraud. Among other requirements, this member state will have to establish appropriate and effective electronic reporting obligations on all taxable persons, in particular those to which the mechanism would apply.

      "This directive will provide a solution for member states that face endemic carousel fraud. It is an exceptional measure, limited in time, that could prove to be an efficient way to fight VAT fraud." Hartwig Löger, minister for finance of Austria, which holds the Council presidency in the 2nd half of 2018

      The generalised reverse charge mechanism may only be used by a member state once it meets the eligibility criteria and its request has been authorised by the Council. The application of this measure is also subject to strict EU safeguards.

      The reverse charge mechanism can already be applied on a temporary basis, but not in a generalised manner. Under the current rules, it is limited to a pre-determined list of sectors. It may only be used by a member state that has made a specific request and if authorised to do so by the Council.

      The directive will offer a short-term solution for containing fraud by the most affected member states, pending ongoing negotiations on a new and definitive VAT system where supplies would be taxed in the country of destination. The Commission has recently tabled the proposals aimed at replacing the current ‘transitional’ VAT arrangements by a definitive system. 

      The directive is expected to be adopted without further discussion once the European Parliament has delivered its opinion.

    • 13 July

      Council discusses VAT reverse charge mechanism proposal

      At its meeting on 13 July 2018, the Economic and Financial Affairs Council discussed the proposal on VAT reverse charge mechanism. However, ministers were unable to reach an agreement and decided to get back to it at their meeting in October.

    • 25 May

      Council discussed the proposal on VAT reverse charge mechanism

      On 25 May 2018, the Economic and Financial Affairs Council discussed the proposal on VAT reverse charge mechanism. However, ministers were unable to reach an agreement.

  • 2017

    • 16 June

      Council discusses compromise proposal on generalised VAT reverse charge mechanism

      At its meeting on 16 June, the Economic and Financial Affairs Council discussed the compromise proposal prepared by the Council presidency with the aim of reaching an agreement on the draft directive. Despite considerable progress made in the talks, the discussion concluded without an agreement, which requires unanimity in the Council. 

      It will be expected in the second half of 2017.

    • 21 March

      Council debates the proposal on VAT reverse charge mechanism

      At the Economic and Financial Affairs Council meeting, EU finance ministers discussed the proposal for a Council directive concerning the generalised VAT reverse charge mechanism.

      The purpose of the discussion was to obtain guidance on the scope of the proposed directive, the criteria for the application of the reverse charge mechanism, its repealing and the duration of its application. 

      The views expressed will serve as a basis for further work in the Council.

    • 27 January

      Council hears the presentation of the proposal

      The European Commission presented to the Council a proposal concerning the application of a generalised VAT reverse charge mechanism. The ministers exchanged views. 

      The Council's Working Party on Tax Questions - Indirect Taxation started working on the proposal.

  • 2016